‘Voters like a spot of island nation-state jingoism’
Your digest of analysis and commentary from the British and international press
John Kampfner in The Times
Fishing row needs quiet diplomacy, not wartime headlines
on war talk
“It wasn’t quite the Battle of Trafalgar or Goose Green, but, if you were swept away by some of the coverage yesterday, you will have read how the perfidious French were sent scurrying back to their own shores by British naval might,” writes John Kampfner in The Times. “Manna from heaven – again – for the Brexiteers. Yesterday morning one UK tabloid bellowed: “We’re ready for war”, he adds. “Its coverage was adorned with Dad’s Army style arrows pointing to the supposed invasion.” Voters, it seems, “like a spot of island nation-state jingoism, not just in the UK”. After the French threatened to cut off electricity to Jersey, it seems the French do too; President Macron is, after all, “looking nervously over his shoulders before presidential elections in exactly a year”.
David Gauke in the New Statesman
Why the new royal yacht could be politically dangerous for Boris Johnson
on choppy waters
It’s rumoured that Boris Johnson will announce “within weeks” plans for a new national flagship yacht named after the Duke of Edinburgh. The plans would “upset all the right people”, writes former Tory MP David Gauke in the New Statesman, which may be Johnson’s “unspoken reason for going ahead with the project”. “Imagine the uproar when this is announced as various lefty republicans rush forward to condemn the plan and, while they are at it, have a go at the whole institution of the monarchy,” he continues. “Upsetting the earnest left-winger is something the prime minister enjoys and is part of his appeal to a large part of the electorate.” But there is one consideration“that should worry the government in the longer term”. The plan “highlights a vulnerability for Johnson: he is perceived as being careless with financial matters; prone to backing extravagant projects; and, as Thatcher might have put it, destined to run out of other people’s money”.
Marina Hyde in The Guardian
After humiliation in Hartlepool, where now for smalltown detective DI Starmer?
on lost heartlands
“The Conservatives have won Hartlepool, a seat Labour held since its creation in 1974, with a candidate so invisible she might have been an urban myth,” writes Marina Hyde in The Guardian. “Impressively, Labour’s remainer candidate was an even more batshit choice.” “Increasingly, Labour’s stated mission to rekindle with its lost heartlands feels a bit maudlin and entitled. It’s got the flavour of one of those stories where a man sets up a piano beneath his ex-girlfriend’s window and vows to play it until she gets back with him,” she adds. “Journalists who don’t really get it cover the story with headlines like ‘The last romantic’”, but “all normal women who read it are just thinking: I know exactly what kind of guy he is. I hope she and her new boyfriend will eventually be able to relax in witness protection.”
James Moore in The Independent
A struggle to shop, park or get down the street. This is the reality of post-Covid life for disabled Britons
on wheelchair accessibility
“Al fresco dining and drinking. We’re all down with that. People need a break. Businesses need revenue. But that can’t be at the cost of closing off urban spaces to those of us unable to perform something akin to wheelchair acrobatics just to access the pavements we pay tax to maintain,” writes James Moore in The Independent. “The way things are going, they’ll be considering street navigation as the next Paralympic sport,” he adds, and “that’s if you can even get to these areas in the first place”. “Disabled parking bays seem to be vanishing in puffs of pandemic smoke wherever you look” while “Transport for London is blaming its financial crisis for the effective suspension of work to make stations step free.” Covid-19 has “greatly exacerbated” existing problems: “It’s almost as if the virus has delivered a time machine and taken the entire country back fifty years.”
John Thornhill in the Financial Times
Don’t leave framing free expression to Facebook’s ‘supreme court’
on a major oversight
“Donald Trump’s supporters say it is a disgrace that Facebook’s oversight board has just upheld the decision to ban the former US president from the social network,” writes John Thornhill in the Financial Times. “Many of his opponents say it is a fitting punishment for inciting post-election violence in Washington,” he continues, “but the broader and more important issue is whether a Facebook-designed, appointed and funded oversight board is the appropriate body to be making such judgments.” “Why has it been left to a private company to create a faux public institution, Facebook’s ‘supreme court’, to draw the boundaries of free expression?” While there may be no “simple answers” we shouldn’t allow the social media giant to “frame these issues for all of us for its own corporate convenience”.