Instant Opinion

‘Keir Starmer is a breath of fresh air’

Your digest of analysis from the British and international press

1

Paul Routledge in The Mirror

Keir Starmer shows what integrity can do to change the corrupt life of politics

on putting politics second

“Talk about a breath of fresh air,” says Paul Routledge in The Mirror. Keir Starmer has shown “what one man’s integrity can do to change the corrupt life of politics”. In a brief address of “searing honesty” about allegations of breaking Covid-19 rules, the Labour leader “laid bare the difference between his leadership and that of lying, power-obsessed Boris Johnson”. Starmer “is willing to stake everything on public faith in his honour”. During his televised statement, he “grew in stature by the minute as he put his future as a possible Prime Minister of our country on the line”. There were “no ifs, no buts, no excuses, no Downing Street spin, no Tory double-speak”. Routledge hopes Starmer won’t have to stand down. If he does “at least I put my faith in a man for whom integrity came first, and political ambition second”.

2

Markos Kounalakis in The Wall Street Journal

For Russia, it’s all about the Benjamins

on big bills

“There’s one thing the U.S. Treasury can do to put real political pressure on Vladimir Putin,” writes Markos Kounalakis in The Wall Street Journal: “stop circulating and honoring $100 bills in Russia”. Wealthy Russians “protect their life savings” by converting rubles to dollars “and stashing them at home”, and “for years, Russians’ bill of preference has been the $100”. “Messing” with the $100 note “causes panic in Russia”, he says. Economic sanctions “have failed to dissuade” Putin’s military aims, “in part because they do little to affect the well-being of most Russians”. Phasing out US bills “could cause real domestic backlash against war in Ukraine”. No matter how Putin tried to “obscure or spin this”, Russians would know that their leader’s actions “led to their savings being wiped out”.

3

Robert Jobson in the Evening Standard

Jubilee should herald Charles gradually taking more of the strain

on ‘passing the baton’

“Make no mistake,” says Robert Jobson in the Evening Standard: today’s State Opening of Parliament “is hugely significant in the story of the House of Windsor”. Prince Charles has, for the first time, read the Queen’s Speech in place of the monarch – a “simple act” that has “marked a sea-change in the transition of the Crown”. During the address, “one couldn’t help thinking” that the Queen “was passing on the baton”. Jobson says the Royal Family “should use this watershed moment to bring matters to a head”. The monarch “should not be expected to continue to carry out the mentally taxing and physical demands required of a constitutional head of state”. The Prince of Wales “is a man of vision”, “dedicated and dutiful” – and “the best prepared monarch in waiting ever”. The Queen “deserves the chance to step aside while retaining her crown”, and the jubilee celebrations “might be the right time to do that”.

4

Stella Creasy in The Independent

New Labour risks becoming like Friends – endlessly repeated without new ideas

on a different world

As a young activist, Stella Creasy describes the 1996 Labour conference as similar to being “at a religious revival meeting – by the end we were all screaming and cheering with wild anticipation of a Labour victory and driving Thatcher’s Tories from office”. Creasy still recounts “those heady days” to young campaigners, but warns “we fetishise or mythologise New Labour at our peril”. Today’s Labour Party “must be of this time, this era, in both word and deed” rather than “replicating New Labour”. The world today “is different” to that of New Labour’s reign, and the party needs “a radical rethink not just of what we offer people, but also how we do it”. New Labour “risks becoming the political equivalent of Friends: endlessly replayed as new generations pick apart what was right and wrong while failing to produce new ideas”.

5

Owen Matthews in The Telegraph

Vladimir Putin is trapped in his own rhetoric – and has no way out

on dangerous delusion

“In the absence of any coherent political ideology, World War Two has become Russia’s secular religion,” says Owen Matthews in The Telegraph. “Vladimir Putin is the cult’s high priest, and May 9th is its high holiday.” Yesterday’s Victory Day parade “signalled a radical new turn for Russia” – into “radical isolation and delusion”. For the first time, no foreign dignitaries were invited, and the “clear message” from the Russian leader was that the country is “effectively still fighting the Great Patriotic War”. Putin’s belief that Ukraine is led by fascists “is not just delusional, it’s terrifyingly dangerous” as in that scenario “there can be no compromise, only victory”. Matthews says that “in the face of his military’s humiliation and failure”, Putin has raised the stakes. “The truth is that Putin is trapped.” Soon, “soaring talk of victory, sacrifice and struggle will collide with the reality of modest gains on the ground at vast cost”.

Recommended

‘Was a new statue of Thatcher really a wise idea?’
Margaret Thatcher statue in Grantham
Instant Opinion

‘Was a new statue of Thatcher really a wise idea?’

‘If the UK had won, Eurovision 2023 would have been at a Travel Tavern off the M4’
 Members of the band Kalush Orchestra pose onstage with the Ukrainian flag
Instant Opinion

‘If the UK had won, Eurovision 2023 would have been at a Travel Tavern off the M4’

‘Does Labour have a woman problem?’
Angela Rayner and Keir Starmer
Instant Opinion

‘Does Labour have a woman problem?’

‘Britain needs a democratic monarchy’
Prince Charles
Instant Opinion

‘Britain needs a democratic monarchy’

Popular articles

Is Vladimir Putin seriously ill?
Vladimir Putin
Why we’re talking about . . .

Is Vladimir Putin seriously ill?

The mysterious Russian oligarch deaths
Vladimir Putin has previously deployed ‘extreme measures’ to crush opposition
Why we’re talking about . . .

The mysterious Russian oligarch deaths

Nato vs. Russia: who would win?
Nato troops
In Depth

Nato vs. Russia: who would win?

The Week Footer Banner