Will the Tories really deliver promised 2024 tax cut?
Analysts say reneging on the ‘highly unusual’ pledge could be ‘electorally disastrous’
Less than 24 hours after Rishi Sunak promised a 1p cut in the basic rate of income tax during this parliament, commentators are casting doubt on whether he can and will keep his pledge.
Delivering his Spring Statement yesterday, the chancellor hailed the drop from 20p to 19p in the pound as a “tax cut for workers, for pensioners, for savers” and as a “£5bn tax cut for over 30 million people”. The cut was “fully costed and fully paid for in the plans announced today”, he added.
The only snag, said The Mirror, is that “Brits will have to wait until 2024” for the promised cut to kick in.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Biggest surprise’
The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg said that “given how dramatic the last couple of years have been, I wonder whether or not that promise will actually be able to stand the test of time”.
Sunak has already “given multiple economic statements that have been almost completely overtaken by events”, she noted, and “that may well happen again”.
Announcing a tax cut two years ahead is “highly unusual”, said The Independent’s Andrew Grice. But “it was clever politics”, because Labour will have to say ahead of the next election whether they would reverse the tax cut pledge.
The Tories, by contrast, “cannot afford not to deliver it”, Grice continued, “having already broken their 2019 manifesto pledge not to raise the rate of National Insurance”.
The “danger for Sunak” now, however, is that voters might not be “impressed by his taking tax with one hand next month and giving some of it back with the other in 2024”.
The tax cut pledge was the “biggest surprise” of the Spring Statement, wrote The Spectator’s political editor James Forsyth. For the government to pledge the cut in 2024 – when UK voters are due to go to the polls – and then fail to deliver would be “bizarre, and electorally disastrous”.
“Sunak has lashed himself – and the government – to the mast,” added Forsyth. He predicted that the Treasury will leverage the pledge over the next two years and argue that “this tax cut can only happen if spending is kept under control elsewhere”.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has echoed the allegations that Sunak is “giving with one hand on tax, having previously taken away with the other”.
The head of the think tank, Paul Johnson, said the income tax cut and an increase in the National Insurance threshold would be funded by workers dragged into higher tax bands by the chancellor’s freeze on income tax thresholds and allowances. The changes would make the tax system “both less equitable and less efficient”, Johnson warned.
But the Daily Mail’s Alex Brummer argued that “we must assume there is method to the chancellor’s seeming madness”.
By “squeezing the pips of ordinary taxpayers and corporate Britain”, Sunak has left himself with “some £32bn of spare cash before the next election”, wrote Brummer.
Although the promised tax cut “seems like a lifetime away”, it gives Sunak a “handsome safety net should there be some new geopolitical or health crisis”. The cut “dangled before the Commons with such aplomb yesterday could be a down payment on something bigger as a general election nears”, Brummer added.
And the newspaper that he writes for has called for Sunak to go further.
While several of this morning’s front pages were critical of Sunak’s statement, the Daily Mail led on news that Tory MPs want more tax cuts, under the headline “Now slash taxes even further”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Baltimore bridge disaster: Who is going to pay and how?
Today's Big Question Politicians, legal experts, and the insurance industry are all grappling with the financial fallout of America's worst infrastructure tragedy in years
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Are 'judge shopping' rules a blow to Republicans?
Today's Big Question How the abortion pill case got to the Supreme Court
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Is Donald Trump an intelligence threat?
Today's Big Question Presidential nominees typically get classified briefings. Should Trump?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
What solutions for Gaza have the international community put forward?
Today's Big Question Demilitarised zone and transforming Gaza into a rich waterfront property empire are among more outlandish ideas
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
What can we expect from Vladimir Putin's fifth term?
Today's Big Question 'Conflict abroad and crackdown at home' to continue after Russian president secures new mandate
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Can the EU 'stop the boats'?
Today's Big Question Aid and migration deal with Egypt part of controversial 'cash-for-migration-control approach'
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
How is aid getting into Gaza right now?
Today's Big Question The international effort to provide Palestinians with essentials during wartime has become a Gordian knot of logistics
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published