In Brief

Daniel Craig’s dilemma: the latest ‘public display of virtuous disinheritance’?

Last week, the James Bond actor said he does not plan to leave ‘great sums’ of his estimated £116m fortune to his daughters

Daniel Craig

There’s nothing like a Daniel Craig interview to put one’s own problems in perspective, said Camilla Long in The Sunday Times. “Never has anyone been more horribly embarrassed or clinically depressed by his life choices than the star of five hugely successful James Bonds.”

Last week the actor was brooding about what he would do with the estimated £116m “he has amassed flying around the globe pretending to shag lovely ladies while reciting laughable dialogue”. Describing the idea of large inheritances as “distasteful”, Craig said he was not planning to leave “great sums” to either of his daughters. “My philosophy is: get rid of it or give it away before you go,” he said.

There will be “a lot of giving away to do”, said Rebecca Nicholson in The Guardian. Variety revealed last week that Craig is now the highest-earning actor in the world: Netflix has reportedly agreed to pay him $100m to appear in two sequels to the comic thriller Knives Out.

Good on him, said Karren Brady in The Sun. The son of a Merchant Navy midshipman from the Wirral, Craig earned his fortune through his own hard work. He’s rightly keen that his children’s development isn’t stunted by the expectation of inheriting untold riches.

Craig is one of many celebrities who have made “public displays of virtuous disinheritance”, said Helen Rumbelow in The Times. Bill Gates says he’ll give his children a mere $10m each. Nigella Lawson declared back in 2008 that she wants her children to have no financial security, saying “it ruins people not having to earn money”. It’s a reckoning that many parents are having to make these days, albeit to a lesser degree, as the unprecedented wealth of the boomer generation passes down.

In the UK alone, an estimated £327bn is set to be inherited by younger people over the next decade. The billionaire investor Warren Buffet famously said that the trick was to give children “enough money so that they feel they can do anything, but not so much that they could do nothing”. But the question of how much is too much is very subjective. As Buffet’s example shows – he plans to leave his children $2bn each–the “genetic imperative to protect your offspring is hard to override”.

Recommended

The Southbury Child review: this play feels almost ‘heaven-sent’
Still from the play
In Review

The Southbury Child review: this play feels almost ‘heaven-sent’

Partygate inquiry kicks off: kangaroo court or Westminster’s Jerry Springer?
Labour grandee Harriet Harman
Talking point

Partygate inquiry kicks off: kangaroo court or Westminster’s Jerry Springer?

The pros and cons of streaming trials online
Lady Justice on top of Old Bailey the Central Criminal Court of England and Wales
Pros and cons

The pros and cons of streaming trials online

TV review: Man vs. Bee
Rowan Atkinson as Trevor
In Review

TV review: Man vs. Bee

Popular articles

Are we heading for World War Three?
Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote, Ukraine
In Depth

Are we heading for World War Three?

When will paper £20 and £50 notes expire?
Paper banknotes
Business Briefing

When will paper £20 and £50 notes expire?

What happened to Zara Aleena?
Zara Aleena
In Brief

What happened to Zara Aleena?

The Week Footer Banner