What is inside the buried Mountbatten diaries?
Historian fighting for release of personal journal and letters censored to protect ‘dignity of the Queen’
Censored extracts from diaries and personal letters of a key figure close to the Queen and the late Prince Philip may soon be made public following a four-year battle between the Cabinet Office and a historian.
More than four decades have passed since the death of Louis Mountbatten, yet his diaries “remain so incendiary in the eyes of the government” that the authorities have gone to “extraordinary lengths” to keep them hidden from public view, said The Telegraph.
But Andrew Lownie, who has written a biography of Mountbatten, argued at a tribunal hearing this week that 120 redacted references in the diaries should be made public.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Compromising content?
Mountbatten, the Queen’s cousin and uncle to the Duke of Edinburgh, was murdered in an IRA bombing in 1975. In 2011, his family sold his diaries for £2.8m in lieu of death duties to the University of Southampton.
Most of the diary contents are available for viewing at the university, but certain passages have been redacted as a result of Cabinet Office intervention.
In 2019, the Information Commissioner ruled that all documents should be released into the public domain, after historian Lownie launched his bid for unfettered access. But the decision was appealed by the Cabinet Office, which “argues that the information is too sensitive to be released and that the dignity of the Queen could be compromised”, said The Times.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Roger Smethurst, head of knowledge and information management at the Cabinet Office, told an appeal hearing in London this week that UK relations with other states could be “compromised” if some details were released.
Many of the redacted passages are thought to discuss Mountbatten’s relationship with the Royal Family, but the most sensitive passages are likely to deal with his role in the partition of India, which he oversaw in his role as viceroy.
In 2011, Professor Chris Woolgar, the now retired chief archivist for Southampton University, wrote to the Cabinet Office advising that certain parts of the diaries be redacted.
In an email, he wrote: “I don’t believe these should be available to researchers, possibly from as far back as the mid-1930s, given their many references to the Royal Family (which I can spot).”
The Cabinet Office replied: “We really do think we should keep these closed, given the Royal material which you have already spotted… also the material concerning India and Pakistan is, in some cases, still sensitive from this period.”
The intervention resulted in a ten-year ban on the release of the sensitive sections.
In 2017, however, Lownie, a fellow of the Royal Historical Society, requested access to the material for his biography, The Mountbattens: Their Lives and Loves, “which he eventually published two years later”, said The Telegraph. The refusal of the request triggered the ongoing information tribunal.
The tribunal is also considering the release of personal correspondence, from both Mountbatten and his wife, Edwina.
In 2019, the Information Commission ordered the release of letters from Lady Mountbatten to Jawaharlal Nehru, the leader of the Indian independence movement, and the first prime minister of an independent India.
They wrote to each other regularly from 1947 up until her death in 1960 – “an important period of British-Indian history”, said The Hindu. These letters were also censored after the Cabinet Office objected, amid rumours that the pair had an affair.
Lownie told the tribunal this week that “my view is that information of still greater importance to a complete and accurate historical record is likely to lie within the withheld archival material”.
The historian has also claimed that the diaries could contain evidence of Lord Mountbatten’s alleged bisexuality. Such claims have been “denied by official biographers”, but the historian told the tribunal that “he had uncovered supporting evidence, including information in his FBI file,” The Times reported.
Other redacted sections “are understood to relate to Lord Mountbatten’s sexual preferences, fetish for women in riding boots”, said The Telegraph.
The Cabinet Office is estimated to have spent close to £300,000 of public money fighting the case. A spokesperson said the department count not “comment further whilst legal proceedings are ongoing”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The drive behind Germany's pro-Israel political consensus
Under the Radar Belief that Israel's security is a 'raison d'etre for the German republic' is under growing pressure
By The Week UK Published
-
'The House under GOP rule has become a hostile workplace'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
The Shohei Ohtani gambling scandal is about more than bad bets
In The Spotlight The firestorm surrounding one of baseball's biggest stars threatens to upend a generational legacy and professional sports at large
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
'Manipulated' photo of UK's Princess Kate spiked
speed read The first official image of Kate Middleton since January has been retracted
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The Regency Acts: what happens if King Charles can't perform his duties
The Explainer Monarch's responsibilities could be carried out by a regent or the counsellors of state
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
King Charles diagnosed with cancer
Speed Read Monarch 'remains wholly positive about his treatment', during which senior royals are expected to stand in for him
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Princess of Wales to remain in hospital for two weeks as King prepares for prostate treatment
Speed Read The timing of the two royal medical announcements was said to be an 'unavoidable coincidence'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary: a guide to Denmark's next king and queen
Why everyone's talking about Queen Margrethe II is stepping down after 52 years on Denmark's throne
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
King laughs about his 'sausage fingers' in new documentary
Speed Read Charles's ample digits have long attracted 'attention and concern' but he is often the 'first to poke fun'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Prince Harry: judge rules 'extensive' phone hacking carried out by Mirror Group papers
Speed Read High Court rules in Duke's favour as he urges police investigation, claiming editors lied under oath at Leveson Inquiry
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published