Why has Rishi Sunak failed to hire a new ethics adviser?
PM vowed to bring back ‘integrity, professionalism and accountability’ – so what’s the hold up?
Rishi Sunak is facing growing calls to appoint an ethics adviser following a series of allegations against senior members of his government.
On taking office last month, the prime minister promised there would be “integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level” of his government. Part of this included a pledge, later confirmed by Downing Street, that he would soon appoint an independent adviser on ministerial interests.
The last person to hold the position was Lord Geidt, who resigned in June after just five months in the role saying he had been put in an “impossible and odious position” by Boris Johnson, whom he accused of proposing a “deliberate” breach of the ministerial code. Johnson failed to appoint a replacement as did his immediate successor Liz Truss.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What does an ethics adviser do?
The ethics adviser’s job is to counsel the prime minister on whether members of the government have broken the ministerial code. The position comes with a series of responsibilities, including scrutinising all interest declarations from ministers, providing advice to ministers on how to handle their interests, and overseeing the production of a statement of ministers’ interests twice a year, said The National.
The aim is to “prevent sleaze and corruption from taking hold at the top of the British state”, said The Independent, “but the role has been criticised for being insufficiently powerful, with recommendations easily brushed aside by a prime minister determined to flout the rules”.
For example, even if the independent adviser concludes there has been a breach of the code, the decision on whether to keep that minister in their post remains solely with the PM.
This means the role “is somewhat of a misnomer”, said the Evening Standard, as “the adviser does not exist to hold the prime minister’s feet to the fire”.
Rather, as Dr Catherine Haddon of the Institute for Government explained, they are there to “keep ministers in line” and “allow prime ministers to distance themselves from the investigative and judgement process”.
In recent times this has led to tension between the PM and their adviser, as happened with Geidt and his predecessor, Sir Alex Allan, who according to the Daily Mail “stormed off” after Johnson found that his home secretary at the time, Priti Patel, had not breached the code, despite Allan’s conclusion that she had not “consistently met the high standards required”.
Why does Sunak need one now?
“Sunak said that appointing an ethics adviser would be among the first things he would do as prime minister,” said The Independent.
Yet nearly a month into his premiership the role remains unfilled. This despite his promise to restore integrity to the heart of a government that is already facing several challenges.
First, he faced questions surrounding the reappointment of Suella Braverman as home secretary only days after she had resigned from the Truss government for breaching the ministerial code. This was followed by multiple allegations of bullying and the subsequent resignation of former chief whip Gavin Williamson.
The Evening Standard said “the absence of such an adviser reared its head again” following allegations of bullying made against the deputy prime minister and justice secretary Dominic Raab.
With no independent adviser in place, Sunak said he would appoint someone else to lead an inquiry into the claims, a move criticised by Labour.
There is no doubt “an independent adviser would help the prime minister”, said Prospect. “Such a figure could have investigated any allegations that were floating around before Williamson’s appointment was made, or at the very least investigated new ones when they arose, and would have been able to look into the furore surrounding Braverman’s use of personal emails to forward government documents,” said the magazine.
“Instead, the prime minister is left to get to the bottom of these claims without such support – a distraction from the job of governing and dealing with pressing issues like the cost-of-living crisis.”
Is the role fit for purpose?
As highlighted by Johnson and Truss, a prime minister is under no obligation to appoint an ethics adviser. This has led MPs to table a new Independent Adviser on Ministerial Interests (Parliamentary Appointment) Bill that would force Downing Street to fill the role.
Yet “the debate about the prime minister’s ongoing failure to appoint an adviser points to a deeper problem about the role’s lack of independence from the prime minister”, said Prospect.
One suggestion to restore credibility from the Committee on Standards in Public Life is that the position should be appointed on a statutory basis.
“It was only under Johnson that the principal role of the ethics adviser came to be investigating the PM,” said Jill Rutter for UK in a Changing Europe. “More normal PMs see them as a helpful adjunct in holding their colleagues to high standards.
“Sunak should make sure the independent adviser has the resources they need – and can initiate their own inquiries and publish the results to their own timetable,” she argued.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Nigeria's worsening rate of maternal mortality
Under the radar Economic crisis is making hospitals unaffordable, with women increasingly not receiving the care they need
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Elevating Earth Day into a national holiday is not radical — it's practical'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
UAW scores historic win in South at VW plant
Speed Read Volkswagen workers in Tennessee have voted to join the United Auto Workers union
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Is David Cameron overshadowing Rishi Sunak?
Talking Point Current PM faces 'thorny dilemma' as predecessor enjoys return to world stage
By The Week UK Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Can Boris Johnson save Rishi Sunak?
Today's Big Question Former PM could 'make the difference' between losing the next election and annihilation
By The Week UK Published
-
Badenoch, Johnson or 'full Trump': who is the future of the Tory Party?
Today's Big Question Tory moderates are preparing to do battle with the right of the party in a post-Sunak leadership election
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
It's the economy, Sunak: has 'Rishession' halted Tory fightback?
Today's Big Question PM's pledge to deliver economic growth is 'in tatters' as stagnation and falling living standards threaten Tory election wipeout
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Fasting to burger buffets: the weird and wonderful diets of politicians
Why Everyone's Talking About Rishi Sunak reportedly starts his week with a 36-hour fast
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Why your local council may be going bust
The Explainer Across England, local councils are suffering from grave financial problems
By The Week UK Published
-
Rishi Sunak and the right-wing press: heading for divorce?
Talking Point The Telegraph launches 'assault' on PM just as many Tory MPs are contemplating losing their seats
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published