Slavery and the monarchy: time for a royal reckoning?
King Charles has given his backing to project investigating the links between the British monarchy and the transatlantic slave trade
The list of British institutions reconsidering their uncomfortable relationship with slavery has just acquired an illustrious new member, said The Times.
Buckingham Palace announced last week that King Charles has given his backing to a new research project investigating the links between the British monarchy and the transatlantic slave trade. The Royal Archives would be opened up to assist with the project, the Palace said, adding: “This is an issue that His Majesty takes profoundly seriously.”
‘About time royals acknowledged role’
The statement followed The Guardian’s report that, in 1689, William III was given £1,000 of shares in the slave-trading Royal African Company, awarded to him by the notorious slave-owner Edward Colston. It’s about time, said Brooke Newman in The Guardian. There’s already an extensive paper trail linking the Crown to “the enslavement and death of millions of Africans” – starting 450 years ago, when Elizabeth I sponsored slaving expeditions to west Africa. It’s time for the British monarchy to finally acknowledge its role in “the greatest crime against humanity”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The links are indeed extensive, said Harry de Quetteville in The Daily Telegraph. The Royal African Company was, as its name suggests, part-founded by the Stuart royal family. In 1713, Queen Anne secured the Asiento de negros – an exclusive contract to supply slaves to Spain’s American colonies, which she sold to the South Sea Company. George III believed that slavery was, as he put it, “an inhuman custom”, but during his reign he supported it. His son William IV was a passionate defender of the slave trade.
‘Nothing to do with Charles’
Sorry, but “what has all this got to do with King Charles”,asked Lawrence Goldman in the Daily Mail. It’s true that slave traders flourished under the Stuarts and Hanoverians. But Charles III “has vanishingly small direct connections” to these figures from centuries ago, and it would be absurd to hold him in any way responsible.
In this period, slavery was “near-universal”, said Daniel Hannan in The Sunday Telegraph. What was unusual about Britain was that “it went on to pour its blood and treasure into eradicating the foul business”, spending 1.8% of its GDP between 1808 and 1867 on “the most expensive moral foreign policy in human history”. Sadly, that detail doesn’t fit with the fashionable historical narrative, which tries “to convince us that Britain became rich through exploitation” – not, as was actually the case, through free markets and the rule of law. This is not real history: it’s “a morality tale in which the villains are white British men”.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
5 high-caliber cartoons about Kristi Noem shooting her puppy
Cartoons Artists take on the rainbow bridge, a farm upstate, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Why is the world running low on blood?
Podcast Scientists believe universal donor blood is within reach – plus, the row over an immersive D-Day simulation, and an Ozempic faux pas
By The Week Staff Published
-
Rishi Sunak's asylum spat with Ireland explained
In Depth Irish government plans to override court ruling that the UK is unsafe for asylum seekers
By The Week UK Published
-
Duchess of Gloucester: the hard-working royal you've never heard of
Under The Radar Outer royal 'never expected' to do duties but has stepped up to the plate
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
'Manipulated' photo of UK's Princess Kate spiked
speed read The first official image of Kate Middleton since January has been retracted
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Modern royal scandals from around the world
The Explainer From Spain to the UAE, royal families have often been besieged by negative events
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The Regency Acts: what happens if King Charles can't perform his duties
The Explainer Monarch's responsibilities could be carried out by a regent or the counsellors of state
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
King Charles diagnosed with cancer
Speed Read Monarch 'remains wholly positive about his treatment', during which senior royals are expected to stand in for him
By Arion McNicoll, The Week UK Published
-
Princess of Wales to remain in hospital for two weeks as King prepares for prostate treatment
Speed Read The timing of the two royal medical announcements was said to be an 'unavoidable coincidence'
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Crown Prince Frederik and Crown Princess Mary: a guide to Denmark's next king and queen
Why everyone's talking about Queen Margrethe II is stepping down after 52 years on Denmark's throne
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
King laughs about his 'sausage fingers' in new documentary
Speed Read Charles's ample digits have long attracted 'attention and concern' but he is often the 'first to poke fun'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published