Why we’re talking about . . .

Inside the first public US hearing on UFOs in half a century

Reports of unidentified aerial phenomena have doubled in the last year, say intelligence officials

US Congress has held its first public hearing on unexplained aerial phenomena (UAPs) – more commonly referred to as UFOs – for the first time in half a century, taking testimony from top intelligence officials. 

The hearing brought together top intelligence officials and members of Congress on both sides of the aisle, and left them in agreement that “UAPs are indeed real, though they still remain a mystery”, said Forbes.

The House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Subcommittee, also known as the C3, held an open hearing, followed by a closed, classified briefing. 

Turning over a leaf on transparency

The hearing follows the release of a Congress-ordered report on UAPs last June, which found that out of dozens of reported incidents, only one could be explained.

The nine-page “Preliminary Assessment” from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) focused on 144 incidents dating back to 2004 but only one object was identified, as “a large, deflating balloon”, said CBS.

The unidentified flying objects are almost certainly real, as “at least 80 of the 144 incidents were detected by multiple sensors, the report found”, said the broadcaster.

“UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security,” said the report.

The hearing is designed to follow up on the national security and flight safety questions raised by the report, with committee members stressing that the government was “determined to turn over a new leaf of investigation and transparency”, said Forbes. 

The stigma of reporting

In his opening remarks, subcommittee chairman Rep. Andre Carson said that “stigma” associated with reporting UAPs had got in the way of “good intelligence analysis” of UAP incidents.

“Pilots avoided reporting or were laughed at when they did. DOD [Department of Defense] officials relegated the issue to the backroom or swept it under the rug entirely, fearful of a sceptical national security community,” said Carson. 

“Today, we know better. UAPs are unexplained, it's true. But they are real. They need to be investigated. And any threats they pose need to be mitigated,” he added.

The theories on UFOs

The hearing took testimony from Ronald Moultrie, the under secretary of defence for intelligence and security, and Scott W. Bray, deputy director of naval intelligence.

Last year’s ODNI report suggested that there was simply not enough data to identify most objects, although speculated on a number of theories including “airborne debris, natural atmospheric conditions, technology from foreign adversaries or top-secret U.S. government technology, and a catch-all miscellaneous category that the authors simply called ‘other’”, said Forbes.

Bray told the hearing that the quantity of data now being gathered was improving, and that the number of unidentified flying objects reported by the military had doubled in the last year to about 400 incidents.

But Moultrie told the hearing that there was still “insufficient data” to make sufficient conclusions. “We have insufficient data either on the event itself, the object itself or insufficient data,” said the intelligence official. “So it’s a data issue that we’re facing.”

It is unlikely that any unexplained aerial phenomena have an alien origin, said Bray, who told lawmakers that “the UAP task force doesn’t have any wreckage that isn’t explainable, that isn’t consistent with being of terrestrial origin”.


Is the US Supreme Court fit for purpose?
US Supreme Court

Is the US Supreme Court fit for purpose?

‘Johnson on the brink’
Today’s newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘Johnson on the brink’

‘Sounds of intimacy’ heard at Wimbledon’s meditation space
A lawn at Wimbledon tennis championships
Tall Tales

‘Sounds of intimacy’ heard at Wimbledon’s meditation space

Putin and Russia’s territorial ambitions
A large column of Russian military vehicles and troops move in the direction of the Crimean capital of Simferopol in February 2014
Getting to grips with . . .

Putin and Russia’s territorial ambitions

Popular articles

Are we heading for World War Three?
Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote, Ukraine
In Depth

Are we heading for World War Three?

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 6 July 2022
10 Downing Street
Daily Briefing

Ten Things You Need to Know Today: 6 July 2022

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?
Nato troops
Today’s big question

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?

The Week Footer Banner