Global lens

France’s withdrawal from Mali: a victory for the Kremlin?

Now, the Kremlin has spotted an opportunity to expand its influence across Africa

France’s imminent military withdrawal from Mali has grim echoes of the West’s chaotic exit from Afghanistan last year, said François Brousseau in Le Devoir (Montreal). Paris first sent troops to Mali in 2013 to defeat jihadists threatening to take over the west African nation; but the mission turned into a nine-year struggle against the militants. Now a diplomatic breakdown between France and the military junta that overthrew Mali’s elected government in 2020 has led President Macron to announce that his 2,400 troops there will be gone by the summer.

Paris claims that the exit is not a defeat; but the situation in the Sahel region suggests things have hardly been going well. The Sahel, the semi-arid swathe south of the Sahara, is “teeming” with Islamist militants; a “fierce turf war” has been raging between Islamic State-leaning factions and al-Qa’eda. Inter-ethnic conflicts are adding to the chaos. Some 20,000 people have been killed in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger since 2015. Yet now, France is “leaving Mali on its own” – fearing that it would be “kicked out” if it stayed.

France has notched up some tactical victories during its nine-year campaign, said Zéphirin Kpoda in L’Observateur Paalga (Ouagadougou): thousands of militants have been killed in the region, including several prominent al-Qa’eda and Islamic State figures. But it has come at a high price: France spent about €1bn a year on its mission in the Sahel, and has lost 59 of its troops.

Having been welcomed with chants of “Vive La France!” when they first entered Mali, French forces soon lost public support, said Mucahid Durmaz on Al Jazeera (Doha). The Tricolour came to be considered “a neo-colonial symbol”; and when the junta expelled France’s ambassador in January, Paris decided to make its exit.

The final straw for Macron, said The Wall Street Journal, was Mali’s decision to invite in 1,000 mercenaries from Russia’s Wagner Group. The “guns-for-hire” group, with close links to Putin’s regime, has “propped up dictators from Venezuela to Syria” and has a history of human rights abuses. Now, the Kremlin has spotted an opportunity to expand its influence “across resource-rich Africa” by protecting leaders who employ its mercenaries, in exchange for lucrative mining opportunities.

Russia is staking its claim to one of the world’s most oil- and mineral-rich regions, said Benoît Delmas in Le Point (Paris), inviting itself into an area the West no longer has the appetite to protect. It’s “a boon” for the Kremlin, but it won’t stem the “terrorist contagion” sweeping the Sahel.

Recommended

Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 May
Speculation is mounting over the publication date of Sue Gray’s Partygate report
Quizzes and puzzles

Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 May

Properties of the week: dreamy Italian homes for under €1m
Six gorgeous homes
The wish list

Properties of the week: dreamy Italian homes for under €1m

Nato’s renaissance: how the world’s most powerful military alliance has taken centre stage
Long table of men at Nato summit
In Depth

Nato’s renaissance: how the world’s most powerful military alliance has taken centre stage

Curtailing abortion rights: will Republicans rue their victory?
Students protest anti-abortion measures
Talking point

Curtailing abortion rights: will Republicans rue their victory?

Popular articles

Is Vladimir Putin seriously ill?
Vladimir Putin
Why we’re talking about . . .

Is Vladimir Putin seriously ill?

The mysterious Russian oligarch deaths
Vladimir Putin has previously deployed ‘extreme measures’ to crush opposition
Why we’re talking about . . .

The mysterious Russian oligarch deaths

Caroline Watt: where is Rebekah Vardy’s missing agent?
Rebekah Vardy arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice
Profile

Caroline Watt: where is Rebekah Vardy’s missing agent?

The Week Footer Banner