Why we’re talking about . . .

The reasons Joe Biden is unlikely to extend Afghanistan evacuation deadline

US military advisers urge president to decide on exit plan immediately

Joe Biden has been warned that he must decide today whether to extend the evacuation of Afghanistan amid growing threats from the Taliban, according to an insider source. 

A defence official told CNN that military experts had cautioned that a decision was needed immediately “to have enough time to withdraw the 5,800 troops currently on the ground, as well as their equipment and weapons”. But the president’s closest advisers are thought to be against extending the 31 August deadline, “citing the security situation on the ground”, the broadcaster reported.

Deadly ‘consequences’

UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace has also warned that only “hours, not weeks” remain to complete evacuations from Kabul airport, where an Afghan soldier was killed and three other people wounded by armed attackers yesterday morning. Wallace’s intervention came as the Taliban warned of further “consequences” if foreign forces try to remain in Afghanistan beyond next week.

The US president had told reporters on Sunday that “discussions” were “going on in the military” about pushing back the evacuation deadline. But he added: “My hope is we will not have to extend.”

However, G7 leaders are “expected to press him to extend” during a virtual meeting today, CNN reported.

Prior to the meeting, Wallace “confirmed Britain would still like the deadline to be extended”, to “allow more time for British nationals and Afghans who have worked with the military during the 20-year presence there to be flown out”, said The Guardian.

But the defence secretary cautioned that an extension was unlikely, owing to “Biden’s desire to stick to the 31 August deadline and the Taliban’s strong opposition to revising the timetable”, the paper added.

Wallace told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the US would have “the biggest vote in the room” during the G7 meeting. And even if an extension were agreed, the Taliban would probably hit back by “preventing people getting to the airport” or through “military activity that could potentially close the airport”, he said. 

‘Uneasy truce’

The killing of an Afghan soldier guarding the perimeter of Kabul airport yesterday has served to “shatter” the “uneasy truce” between the Taliban and the withdrawing US forces, said The Times’ war correspondent Anthony Loyd.

Reporting from the Afghanistan capital, he added that “it remains unclear if the strained ceasefire between these sides will last”, despite “daily direct talks between Taliban and American officers, coordinated by the senior coalition commander in Kabul, US Rear Admiral Peter Vasely”.

If Biden extends next weeks deadline “in an attempt to regain a more timely order of the chaotic evacuation, then the Taliban might attack coalition forces and the fighting would begin again”, Loyd continued.

However, adhering to the deadline may mean that “the sense of mounting panic and desperation among the thousands of terrified Afghans clustered around the airport gates” could “pose a threat of its own”.

“Afghans are becoming more desperate as the end of August approaches,” Sky News reported, “with the last civilian flight to leave some time before that.” 

As many as 20 people are reported to have been killed in the past week while trying to get into the airfield.

Wallace told the broadcaster this morning that “as we get closer to the deadline, I think it’s correct to say the security risk goes up”. The threat is increased by “add-on groups and other terrorist groups like Isis” who would “like to be seen chasing the West out of the Afghanistan”, he said.

“The mission to evacuate US citizens, visa applicants and other vulnerable Afghans accelerated dramatically over the weekend,” CNN reported. But Afghan employees at the former US embassy in Kabul told the broadcaster “that their attempts to get to the airport and leave the country have been brutally draining and unsuccessful”.

Similar stories are emerging from other at-risk Afghans. “I don’t even know who among those who fought this war to trust anymore,” a 40-year-old Hazara man named only as Ismatullah, who was waiting to be evacuated to Doha with his ten-strong family, told The Times’ Loyd. 

“We have always feared the Taliban, but in the Americans we believed that our homeland had a sweeter future. That belief has led us to this place of fear and bitterness, with nothing left but the wish to escape.”

Recommended

Backstage in the White House: what is at stake for Boris Johnson?
Boris Johnson in New York
Behind the scenes

Backstage in the White House: what is at stake for Boris Johnson?

Joe Biden: ‘a default president at the helm of a middling administration’
Joe Biden
In Brief

Joe Biden: ‘a default president at the helm of a middling administration’

Aukus: the new security pact between UK, US and Australia explained
Joe Biden announces Aukus pact
Getting to grips with . . .

Aukus: the new security pact between UK, US and Australia explained

Al-Qaeda rebuilding to plan US attacks within ‘two years’
A Taliban fighter stands guard at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul
In Depth

Al-Qaeda rebuilding to plan US attacks within ‘two years’

Popular articles

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying
The feet of a person sleeping in a bed
Tall Tales

Doctor says we should not sleep naked because of flatulent spraying

Abba returns: how the Swedish supergroup and their ‘Abba-tars’ are taking a chance on a reunion
Abba on stage
In Brief

Abba returns: how the Swedish supergroup and their ‘Abba-tars’ are taking a chance on a reunion

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives
Kenneth Feinberg at a Congressional hearing
Profile

The man tasked with putting a price on 9/11’s lost lives

The Week Footer Banner