Was the US occupation of Afghanistan an inevitable failure?
Bush vowed the US would rebuild the war-torn country. But 20 years and $2trn later, the ‘nation-building folly’ has ended in ‘catastrophe’
Back in April 2002, George W. Bush explained to a group of US army cadets that the history of imperial military involvement in Afghanistan was “one of initial success, followed by long years of floundering and ultimate failure. We are not going to repeat that mistake,” he assured them. But we did, said Rod Dreher in Newsweek. In that same speech, Bush vowed that the US would rebuild war-torn Afghanistan as it had postwar Europe. Yet 20 years and $2trn later, “our nation-building folly” has ended in “catastrophe”, with the Taliban back in charge, and the US humiliated.
But while the speed of the takeover may have been a shock, it was always clear that America’s Afghan mission would end badly, because the premise on which it was based – that “all peoples want individual freedom and share our vision of prosperity” – was fundamentally flawed. Liberal democracy is not “the natural state of humankind, but rather a mindset that emerges under certain conditions”, and those were just not present in Afghanistan.
I wouldn’t go as far as to say that failure was set in stone, said Daron Acemoglu on Qantara.de. But the “top down” state-building strategy the US adopted was doomed. Of course, the US was right that Afghanistan needed a functioning government; where it went wrong was in thinking that it could use its military might to impose one on a country that is notorious for its ethnic and tribal divisions, and that has a long history of throwing off centralised control.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Had the US worked closely with local groups, it might have been able to create state institutions that had some popular support. Instead, it poured billions into the “extravagantly corrupt” and nonrepresentative regime led by Hamid Karzai. Ashraf Ghani, the president who fled last month, had written books on fixing failed states – but “continued down the same road” as Karzai.
What few in the West seem to appreciate is just how much suffering was inflicted on the Afghan people during the US’s 20-year occupation, said Muhammad Mahmood in The Financial Express. At least 164,000 people were killed – by reaper drones and B-52 bombers, and by the CIA-backed militias, controlled by criminal warlords, who committed countless atrocities under the guise of rooting out the Taliban.
There is a sense in the West that the violent occupation was justified by the benefits it brought to Afghan women, but even these are somewhat illusory: only 2% of women, mainly from the Western-backed elite, had access to further education; 84% are still illiterate. The Taliban may be brutally repressive, but to many in a weary, embittered nation it offered stability – and the hope of something better than the status quo.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Nigeria's worsening rate of maternal mortality
Under the radar Economic crisis is making hospitals unaffordable, with women increasingly not receiving the care they need
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Elevating Earth Day into a national holiday is not radical — it's practical'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
UAW scores historic win in South at VW plant
Speed Read Volkswagen workers in Tennessee have voted to join the United Auto Workers union
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Ukraine's counteroffensive: has it failed?
Talking Point Russia-Ukraine war has entered period of 'static, attritional warfare'
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Putin is weaponising grain in the war with Ukraine
Under the Radar Russian president’s use of food as a strategic weapon could prove brutally effective
By The Week Staff Published
-
Putin vs. Wagner: saved by kompromat?
Talking Point Analysts believe the mercenary may know too much about the workings of the Kremlin
By The Week Staff Published
-
Daniel Ellsberg: whistleblower who leaked the Pentagon Papers
feature Once dubbed ‘the most dangerous man in America’, the official claimed never to have regretted leaking
By The Week Staff Published
-
The Taliban’s ‘unprecedented’ crackdown on opium poppy crops in Afghanistan
feature Cultivation in former poppy-growing heartland Helmand has been slashed from 120,000 hectares to less than 1,000
By Julia O'Driscoll Published
-
The mystery Kremlin drone attack and Ukraine’s crucial counteroffensive
feature Russia prompts furious guessing game ahead of Kyiv’s push to regain occupied ground
By The Week Staff Published
-
Are US Republicans going soft on Ukraine?
feature Recent polls show that 47% of Republicans think the US is doing too much
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will Vladimir Putin be put on trial for Ukraine’s stolen children crisis?
In Depth Russian president has been charged with war crimes for abducting thousands of Ukrainian children
By The Week Staff Last updated