Explained: the rent expenses ‘loophole’ used by MPs to pocket taxpayer cash
Two Labour lawmakers and 15 Tories claimed total of £1.3m for rental costs while letting out own properties
MPs including five government ministers are using the parliamentary expenses scheme to cover rental payments while making at least £10,000 a year each letting out properties in London, an investigation has found.
An analysis by The Independent of expenses claims found that over the past five years, a total of 17 MPs have used a loophole to claim a total of more than £1.3m in taxpayer-funded cash.
The findings have prompted anger and calls for reform as Boris Johnson's government “faces growing pressure over a deluge of ‘sleaze’ claims”, said the paper.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Makes no sense’
According to The Times, “many of the MPs who benefit from the system are themselves highly critical of it and claim that they have been pushed into the arrangement” by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa). “They say that ultimately it costs taxpayers more,” the paper continued.
The loophole was created in 2010, when the expenses watchdog banned MPs from claiming mortgage interest payments following a separate expenses scandal. The move was “intended to stop them from making capital gains on taxpayer-funded properties”.
Ipsa said the new rules would only allow MPs to claim for “rental payments and associated costs”.
Some MPs who already owned London properties criticised the crackdown on mortgage expenses, arguing that they were being forced to subsidise the cost of having a second home that they needed in order to spend time in both London and their constituencies.
“To get round the new system – and not to lose out financially – some MPs decided to let the homes they owned in London while renting another property and claiming up to £22,920 per year from Ipsa,” said The Times.
Landlord MPs
The Independent reported that 15 Conservatives and two Labour lawmakers were making cash as “landlord MPs”.
The group include Tory former attorney general Geoffrey Cox. The Mirror revealed earlier this week that Cox “rakes in” around £1,000 a month by renting out a property in Battersea while claiming £1,900 to rent another property in the capital.
Cox is also currently “facing scrutiny over the £1m a year he earns as a lawyer”, said The Times. The row has been fuelled by suggestions that he used his parliamentary office while performing duties attached to his second job.
The five current ministers who have also claimed for rent while letting out London homes include International Trade Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan, Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and Foreign Office Minister James Cleverly.
Trevelyan “has claimed £106,000 in expenses” since 2016, according to The Independent, while Wallace and Cleverly claimed more than “£110,000 in taxpayer-funded rent” and “£71,000 in expenses” respectively.
Prisons minister Victoria Atkins and junior Treasury minister John Glen are reported to have used the loophole too.
Other Conservative MPs to have benefited from the scheme include former trade minister Liam Fox, former media minister John Whittingdale, Philip Davies, Robert Goodwill, Laurence Robertson, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, Anne Marie Morris and Greg Knight.
Labour MPs Geraint Davies and Clive Betts have claimed £67,000 and £44,000 respectively “in taxpayer funding to rent a home”, said the paper.
But Tory backbencher Damian Collins “has the single largest rent expenses submission, claiming just over £148,000” over the past five years.
‘Virtue-signalling’
Alistair Graham, former chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, is leading calls for the loophole to be closed.
“It may be within the rules, but it’s quite wrong for MPs to use the public purse in this way,” he told The Independent. “MPs have a duty to claim only public funds that are necessary.
“If there’s an opportunity to end the loophole allowing them to do this, then we must take it. There is a growing feeling that the rules must change.”
Some critics have suggested effectively “means-testing” MPs before deciding whether they should be able to claim taxpayer funds to pay their London rent. However, an Ipsa spokesperson said the “view has not changed that an MP’s personal financial situation is not a relevant ‘test’ for whether they should receive support”.
“We do not want to judge an MP’s private arrangements and whether or not they should live in a property they own,” the spokesperson added.
“Our concern is to ensure that MPs have the appropriate support they need to carry out their parliamentary roles, including suitable accommodation in two locations.”
Despite the regulator’s defence of the system, some MPs remain unconvinced.
“You could not invent a more stupid system,” an unnamed Tory MP told The Times. “It’s inconvenient for MPs, it’s expensive for the taxpayer and makes no sense. It’s virtue-signalling.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Good riddance to the televised presidential debate'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Caitlin Clark the No. 1 pick in bullish WNBA Draft
Speed Read As expected, she went to the Indiana Fever
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 16, 2024
Cartoons Tuesday's cartoons - sleepyhead, little people, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Is David Cameron overshadowing Rishi Sunak?
Talking Point Current PM faces 'thorny dilemma' as predecessor enjoys return to world stage
By The Week UK Published
-
How will honeytrap scandal change Westminster?
Today's Big Question Security procedures laid bare by spear phishing attack as focus shifts to 'political insider' being responsible
By The Week UK Published
-
Rachel Reeves: does she have a plan?
Talking Point Pundits have critiqued her statements as alternately too conservative and too extreme
By The Week UK Published
-
Vaughan Gething: a new leader for Wales
Talking point Former minister for the economy tasked with revitalising struggling country after being elected First Minister
By The Week UK Published
-
Will Aukus pact survive a second Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question US, UK and Australia seek to expand 'game-changer' defence partnership ahead of Republican's possible return to White House
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Farewell to Theresa May: a PM consumed by Brexit
Talking Point Maidenhead MP standing down at next general election
By The Week UK Published
-
Britain's biggest political donors
The Explainer With the 2024 general election set to be the highest-spending contest ever we look at who is giving to which party and why
By The Week UK Published
-
Can Boris Johnson save Rishi Sunak?
Today's Big Question Former PM could 'make the difference' between losing the next election and annihilation
By The Week UK Published