Apple vs. Qualcomm trial: what’s behind the rivalry?
Five-week legal battle could have a significant impact on the smartphone world
Apple and US chipmaker Qualcomm entered into their next phase of legal hearings at a federal court in San Diego on Monday, as the companies aim to settle a two-year legal dispute over patents.
Qualcomm, which supplied “crucial” processors for iPhones, is suing Apple for $7bn (£5.35bn) in unpaid royalties, along with “other damages totalling billions of dollars”, CNN reports.
Meanwhile, Apple argues that the chipmaker charges “too much for licensing its patents” and is seeking up to $27bn (£20.63bn) in damages, the US-based broadcaster adds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Apple enters the hearing in the wake of a legal victory, having won a preliminary judgment last month that forced Qualcomm to pay “nearly” $1bn (£764m) in “withheld rebates”, say Apple news site MacRumors.
But Qualcomm has also logged a few wins over the past two years. The company has won a series of legal battles against Apple, which resulted in the temporary ban of older iPhones in some countries, The Daily Telegraph says.
When did the feud begin?
Qualcomm has supplied cellular network chips to Apple for its iPhones since 2011, notes Mashable. Under the deal, Apple was required to pay the chipmaker for the processors, as well as settle a licensing fee for the intellectual property (IP) that allows the devices to connect to the internet.
Between 2013 and 2016, Qualcomm agreed to pay Apple a yearly rebate of $1bn as part of the partnership’s exclusivity deal, the tech site adds. Under the terms of the agreement, the iPhone maker was barred from “cooperating with regulators” and working with other chip manufacturers.
Apple filed its first legal complaint against Qualcomm in January 2017, where it accused the chipmaker of charging “high fees” due to the dominance of the iPhone, the BBC reports.
The Cupertino-based tech giant’s case was backed by Foxconn and Pegatron, which assemble Apple’s iPhones, the broadcaster adds.
What does Qualcomm have to say?
The chipmaker argues that its patents are “a hard-won product of billions of dollars of research and development”, and it is therefore “reasonable” to rely on them as a significant revenue stream, The Verge says.
Qualcomm has logged a number of patent infringement complaints against Apple and has seen “a certain amount of success”, the tech site says. Judges in Germany and China found that the iPhone maker had infringed some of Qualcomm’s patents, resulting in the temporary ban of older iPhones in those countries.
By tallying up a series of patent wins, the company hopes to prove that its technology is “more valuable than what it’s been charging”, The Verge adds. While this wouldn’t disprove Apple’s complaints, it could pressure the company into withdrawing its lawsuit.
When will the trial end?
The trial will last for around five weeks, with the opening sessions hearing arguments from lawyers representing each side, the BBC says. Apple chief executive Tim Cook, along with “senior Qualcomm staff”, are due to testify.
There could be significant ramifications if Qualcomm loses the battle, the broadcaster claims. This is because it could prompt other smartphone makers to “challenge the fees they pay” to their suppliers.
What could it mean for the iPhone?
Although Apple no longer uses Qualcomm chips in its iPhones, Qualcomm argues that the iPhone maker stole “vast swathes” of confidential information and gave it to rival firm Intel – which now supplies its processors to Apple, The Verge notes.
Qualcomm is handling this dispute separately to its current legal battle against Apple, the tech site says. It’s therefore not yet known what impact this would have on iPhone sales.
However, it’s unlikely that Qualcomm will supply its technology to Apple in the foreseeable future, and that could have a major impact on the competitiveness of the iPhone in future.
According to Mashable, Qualcomm holds key patents for 5G technology, an ultra-fast mobile network that’s set to shake up the tech industry over the next few years.
Intel isn’t expected to release 5G-compatible chips until at least 2020, while Qualcomm will have the network technology in consumer products this year, the tech site says.
“If Apple and Qualcomm can't work out their differences, 5G on iPhones could still be a long, expensive way off”, the site concludes.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Fallout: one of the 'most faithful – and best – video game adaptations'
The Week Recommends This 'genre-bending' new Amazon series is set in a post-apocalyptic wilderness where survivors shelter below ground
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
'Test of faith for Trump Media's investors'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will Iran attack hinder support for Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Pro-Kyiv allies cry 'hypocrisy' and 'double standards' even as the US readies new support package
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Justice Department bites Apple with iPhone suit
Speed Read The lawsuit alleges that the tech company monopolized the smartphone industry
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Apple kills its secret electric car project
Speed Read Many of the people from Project Titan are being reassigned to work on generative AI
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The pros and cons of virtual reality
Pros and cons The digital world is expanding, for better and for worse
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
The Apple Vision Pro's dystopian debut
Why everyone's talking about Is "spatial computing" the next big thing?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Why Apple's carbon-neutral claims may be misleading
Speed Read The company isn't disclosing all the information, a new report alleges
By Devika Rao Published
-
The advent of the AI iPhone: does new tech show promise or peril?
Talking Point Apple design guru Jony Ive and OpenAI founder Sam Altman believed to be in talks to create new device
By The Week Staff Published
-
China steals the spotlight at Apple's iPhone 15 launch
How will a directive from the Chinese government affect the tech giant?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Why is a tiny change to the iPhone's charger such a big deal?
Today's Big Question A change to comply with EU regulations could have global ramifications
By Justin Klawans Published