Should Mark Zuckerberg’s privacy plans for Facebook be taken seriously?
Tech boss could merge Facebook Messenger with Instagram and WhatsApp
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has announced plans to radically overhaul the social media site in a bid to improve privacy.
The tech entrepreneur said in a blogpost that his company, along with Facebook-owned site Instagram, could become centred around private messaging instead of the “open platforms” they are today.
“As I think about the future of the internet, I believe a privacy-focused communications platform will become even more important than today’s open platforms,” Zuckerberg said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“Many people prefer the intimacy of communicating one-on-one or with just a few friends. People are more cautious of having a permanent record of what they’ve shared,” he added.
“And we all expect to be able to do things like payments privately and securely.”
To achieve this, Zuckerberg plans to overhaul Facebook Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp “so that they are entirely compatible with each other”, The Independent notes. For instance, users would be able to send a message from WhatsApp and receive it on Facebook Messenger.
Part of the plan will see all three systems being encrypted, where data is temporarily scrambled once a user sends a message to another, so that information “cannot be intercepted or read by anybody else”, the news site says.
Zuckerberg also plans to introduce a feature that would permanently delete messages over a period of time.
It’s a dramatic shift from the current model employed by Facebook and Instagram, where users post statuses, pictures and videos for the whole world to see.
But the company has come under fire in recent years over the way it stores and handles user information, prompting Zuckerberg to plan a radical overhaul of his core products.
Should Zuckerberg’s plan be taken seriously?
The announcement is certainly a bold move, but critics argue that the plan is simply too vague.
For example, The New York Times says there are no details on when the plan would come into effect, or what data will be shared between Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.
There are also questions over whether Zuckerberg can deliver on his plans.
Facebook has a history of “promoting privacy-forward features”, such as a “clear history” button, but it often takes months for these features to be introduced, or they’re cancelled altogether, The Verge argues.
The tech site’s claims are backed by Zuckerberg himself: “Frankly we don’t currently have a strong reputation for building privacy protective services, and we’ve historically focused on tools for more open sharing.
“But we’ve repeatedly shown that we can evolve to build the services that people really want, including in private messaging and stories,” he concluded.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Is there a peaceful way forward for Israel and Iran?
Today's Big Question Tehran has initially sought to downplay the latest Israeli missile strike on its territory
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
The Week Unwrapped: Sudan, tackling homelessness and fake news
Podcast What is happening in Sudan? Could London really end rough sleeping? And why has Joe Lycett being making up stories?
By The Week Staff Published
-
Taylor Swift's surprise double album: an event of 'world-shaking proportions'
Why Everyone's Talking About Fans are 'reeling' after The Tortured Poets Department is followed by The Anthology – 15 additional tracks
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Cyberflashing, fake news and the new crimes in the Online Safety Act
The Explainer UK's first conviction demonstrates scope of controversial law that critics describe as a threat to privacy and free speech
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
TikTok predicts 'creative bravery' trends for 2024
talking point Will it be a banner year for the platform, or will it isolate its biggest audience?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Elon Musk's 'frivolous' but precedent-setting free speech fight with Media Matters
Talking Point The lawsuit is just the latest in Musk's ongoing tension with social media watchdogs
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
How AI might influence democracy in 2024
The Explainer Threat from bots and deepfakes stalks key elections around the world next year
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Pros and cons of social media content moderation
Pros and Cons Where do you draw the line between online safety and freedom of speech?
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published