Why everyone’s talking about the Age of Man
Experts make case for new chapter of Earth’s history called the Anthropocene period
A panel of scientists has validated a new geological era called the Anthropocene, meaning “Age of Man”.
After spending a decade gathering evidence, the Anthropocene Working Group, chaired by Professor Jan Zalasiewicz of Leicester University, concluded that the term was suitable to express the profound impact that humans are having on the planet.
If they can persuade the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) to approve the new name, “the result would be literally epoch-changing”, says The Guardian, which notes that “a new chapter of Earth’s history would need to be written”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What happened?
The term “Anthropocene” was first coined by Nobel Prize-winning chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000. It combines “anthropos”, the Greek for human, and “cene”, the suffix used in names of geological epochs, to suggest that Earth’s geological record has been transformed by humanity.
Crutzen argued we were no longer in the Holocene epoch, which began between 12,000 and 11,500 years ago at the close of the Paleolithic Ice Age, but rather in this new Age of Man.
In 2008, Zalasiewicz - a geologist specialising in stratigraphy, the study of rock layers and layering - was asked to assemble a team of experts to gather evidence to determine if this theory was correct.
This month, Zalasiewicz’s team announced that they were in agreement with Crutzen, and that they had defined a more specific date when humans began leaving their permanent mark on the planet - the 1950s.
And the response?
“The name has been the subject of intense debate among experts,” says Newsweek.
Some stratigraphers have argued that the term is more about politics and pop culture than hard science.
Others point to the relatively short amount of time that humans have been on Earth. Stanley Finney, secretary-general of the International Union of Geological Sciences, believes a “negligible amount of ‘stratigraphic content’ has amassed since the 1950s”, says The Guardian.
“Geologists are used to working with strata several inches deep, and Finney thought it was excessively speculative to presume that humans’ impact will one day be legible in rock,” the newspaper reports.
But Zalasiewicz insists it will, telling Nature.com: “The Anthropocene works as a geological unit of time, process and strata. It is distinguishable. It is distinctive.”
What next?
The Anthropocene Working Group will submit a proposal to the ICS by 2021 in a bid to get the term formally approved.
The commission oversees the International Chronostratigraphic Chart, a timescale of the planet’s 4.6 billion-year history, divided into phases, such as the Jurassic period. “Modifying it is a slow and tortuous process,” says The Guardian.
First, Zalasiewicz must pinpoint the “golden spike”, an exact time and location that best marks the start of the phase.
This “may encompass the hydrogen bomb tests of the 1950s, a spike in the burning of fossil fuels, or the emergence of widespread poultry farming”, says Earth.com. And it must be “measurable in the geological record in rocks, lake sediments, ice cores, or other formations in order to qualify as the sign of a new epoch”, adds the science news site.
Zalasiewicz has admitted previously that there are lots of options. “We are spoiled for choice,” he told Paris-based news agency AFP in 2016. “There’s a whole array of potential signals out there.”
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
'Horror stories of women having to carry nonviable fetuses'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Haiti interim council, prime minister sworn in
Speed Read Prime Minister Ariel Henry resigns amid surging gang violence
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 26, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - teleprompter troubles, presidential immunity, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Nigeria's worsening rate of maternal mortality
Under the radar Economic crisis is making hospitals unaffordable, with women increasingly not receiving the care they need
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Dengue hits the Americas hard and early
Speed Read Puerto Rico has declared an epidemic as dengue cases surge
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How happy is Finland really?
Today's Big Question Nordic nation tops global happiness survey for seventh year in a row with 'focus on contentment over joy'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
How Tehran became the world's nose job capital
Under the radar Iranian doctors raise alarm over low costs, weak regulation and online influence of 'Western beauty standards'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Africa's renewed battle against female genital mutilation
Under the radar Campaigners call for ban in Sierra Leone after deaths of three girls as coast-to-coast convoy prepares to depart
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Argentina: the therapy capital of the world
Under the radar Buenos Aires natives go hungry to pay for psychoanalysis, amid growing instability, anxiety – and societal acceptance
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Does declining birth rate spell doom for Britain?
Today's Big Question Ageing population puts pressure on welfare state, economy and fabric of society, while fertility is rising on populist agendas
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
How a new blood test could revolutionise sepsis diagnosis
The Explainer Early results from ongoing trial suggest faster identification of deadly condition is possible
By The Week Staff Published