In Depth

Food banks: benefit sanctions blamed for rising hunger

Government told to do more to achieve a hunger-free Britain by church-backed parliamentary report

Benefit sanctions which result in payments being temporarily stopped or docked are largely responsible for the increase in the use of food banks in the UK, a damning cross-party report has said.

The church-funded inquiry is urging the government to do more to fight food poverty by addressing issues in the benefit system, as more than four million people are at risk of going hungry.

"There is a clear moral case to address the shortcomings that exist in our welfare system," the report said. "Our evidence shows that the current system is cumbersome, complicated and fails to respond effectively to the daily changes in people’s lives."

It also revealed that low wages and high-energy costs were contributing factors in the rise in the use of food banks, The Guardian reports.

The report "paints a stark picture: hunger stalks large parts of our country", said the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, who was involved in the inquiry. He added that he was more shocked by poverty in the UK than in African refugee camps because although it was less severe, it was so unexpected.

However, Conservative business minister Matthew Hancock said the reason the use of food banks had increased was because "more people know about them", the BBC reports.

"While the report outlines important areas for consideration, we should remember that this country has been through the deepest recession in living memory, and sticking to this government's long-term economic plan is the best way to improve living standards," he said.

In order to achieve a "hunger-free Britain", the report is calling for the establishment of a new publically funded body to fight food poverty. It also said existing food banks need to be expanded, the minimum wage should be increased and free school meals should be provided to children from low-income families during school holidays.

Downing Street said it would "seriously consider" the measures laid out in the report. A government spokesperson said the report was welcomed, calling it "a serious contribution to an important debate, with many good ideas".

"As a country we have enough food to go around, and we agree that it is wrong that anyone should go hungry at the same time as surplus food is going to waste," they said.

Recommended

‘Cabinet angry at defending Johnson again’
Today’s newspaper front pages
Today’s newspapers

‘Cabinet angry at defending Johnson again’

The options to fix Britain’s ‘broken’ childcare system
An infant with building blocks
Getting to grips with . . .

The options to fix Britain’s ‘broken’ childcare system

What did Johnson really know about Pincher?
Chris Pincher
Today’s big question

What did Johnson really know about Pincher?

What is Erskine May?
Houses of Parliament
Fact file

What is Erskine May?

Popular articles

Are we heading for World War Three?
Ukrainian soldiers patrol on the frontline in Zolote, Ukraine
In Depth

Are we heading for World War Three?

What happened to Logan Mwangi?
Tributes left to Logan Mwangi
Today’s big question

What happened to Logan Mwangi?

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?
Nato troops
Today’s big question

Nato vs. Russia: who would win in a war?

The Week Footer Banner